- Author
- Reginald Scot (c. 1538–1599)
- Published
- 1584, London
- Argument
- Accusations rooted in fear, poverty and trickery
- Legacy
- Early classic of English scepticism
Historical source
A witness to the trials
Scot had watched witch accusations in Kent, including those heard at local assizes. He saw that the accused were usually old, poor women, often quarrelsome or isolated, blamed when a neighbour's cow died or a child fell ill.
Exposing the tricks
Scot argued that many supposed wonders were natural events, illness, misunderstanding or deliberate deception. He included detailed explanations of conjuring tricks, such as the illusion of a severed head, making the Discoverie an important early source for the history of stage magic.
Opposition and survival
Scot's views were unpopular with many authorities. In 1597 King James VI of Scotland published a treatise attacking sceptics including Scot. A popular story claims James later ordered copies of the Discoverie burned, but there is no firm evidence for this. The book survived and was reprinted, and it is now seen as a humane voice in a century of persecution.
Further reading
- — The Discoverie of Witchcraft (Reginald Scot, 1584)
Historical summaries are provided for education. Reported experiences are not automatically presented as verified paranormal events.
More on witch folklore
The Pendle Witch Trials →
